I don't get it...

Why does the smallest size of pants start at a size 2 at Target when in reality you'd have to be a 6 to fit in them? I mean if you want to call it a size 2....fine by me, but shouldn't you then also have a size 0 and a 00 maybe?! No? It is possible that there might be a couple of customers out there with out hips and slightly on the skinny side....and they too might want to buy a new pair of pants from time to time. Just sayin'....